Skip to Content
KSDE Logo picture
Frequently Asked Questions Site Map Calendar Contact Us Employment Kansas.gov website
Tuesday, May 21, 2013 | Login
ParentsStudentsTeachersAdministratorsData, Media and Reports
You are here: Recovery Act (ARRA) » State Fiscal Stabilization Funds » Phase II Requirements

        
   

State Fiscal Stabilization Funds Phase II Requirements

 

U.S. Department of Education Four Reform Goals and Required Indicators

Achieving Equity in Teacher Distribution (education reform area (a))

View Indicators for this reform goal 

Improving Collection and Use of Data (education reform area (b))

View Indicators for this reform goal 

Standards and Assessments (education reform area (c))

View Indicators for this reform goal 

Supporting Struggling Schools (education reform are (d))

View Indicators for this reform goal 

State Plan Submitted To USDOE For Kansas PDF PDF Document

Kansas Application for Stabilization Funds PDF PDF Document



Achieving Equity in Teacher Distribution (education reform area (a))

Indicator (a)(1)
Posted September, 2011
The number and percentage of core academic courses taught, in the highest-poverty and lowest-poverty schools, by teachers who are highly qualified consistent with section 9101(23) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA)
 

Courses Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers

Descriptor (a)(1)
 
The systems used to evaluate the performance of teachers Teacher Evaluations
Indicator (a)(2) Whether the State’s Teacher Equity Plan (as part of the State’s Highly Qualified Teacher Plan) fully reflects the steps the State is currently taking to ensure that students from low-income families and minority students are not taught at higher rates than other students by inexperienced, unqualified, or out-of-field teachers (as required in section 1111(b)(8)(C) of the ESEA)

Kansas Plan

Plan Update July 2010
Descriptor (a)(2)
 
The systems used to evaluate the performance of principals Principal Evaluations Forms
Indicator (a)(3) Whether the systems used to evaluate the performance of teachers include student achievement outcomes or student growth data as an evaluation criterion

 
Survey Results Excel Document Excel
Indicator (a)(4) If the district's teachers receive performance ratings or levels through an evaluation system, the number and percentage of of teachers rated at each performance rating or level
 
Ranking Survey Cover Sheet

Survey Results 
Excel Document 
Excel
Indicator (a)(5) If the district’s teachers receive performance ratings or levels through an evaluation system, whether the number and percentage of teachers rated at each performance rating or level are publicly reported for each school in the LEA

 
Ranking Survey Cover Sheet

Survey Results 
Excel Document 
Excel
Indicator (a)(6) Whether the systems used to evaluate the performance of principals include student achievement outcomes or student growth data as an evaluation criterion

 
Survey Results
Excel Document 
Excel
Indicator (a)(7) If the district’s principals receive performance ratings or levels through an evaluation system, the number and percentage of principals rated at each performance rating or level

Ranking Survey Cover Sheet

Survey Results 
Excel Document
 Excel

 

Improving Collection and Use of Data (education reform area (b))

Indicator (b)(1) Which of the 12 elements described in section 6401(e)(2)(D) of the America COMPETES Act (20 U.S.C. 9871) are included in the State’s statewide longitudinal data system

 
See Each Element
Indicator (b)(1-1) A unique statewide student identifier that does not permit a student to be individually identified by users of the system described in section 6401(e)(2)(D) of the America COMPETES Act (20 U.S.C. 9871) are included in the State’s statewide longitudinal data system

 
Completed
Indicator (b)(1-2) Student-level enrollment , demographic, and program participation information as described in section 6401(e)(2)(D) of the America COMPETES Act (20 U.S.C. 9871) are included in the State’s statewide longitudinal data system  

 
Completed
Indicator (b)(1-3) Student-level information about the points at which students exit, transfer in transfer out, drop out, or complete P-16 education programs as described in section 6401(e)(2)(D) of the America COMPETES Act (20 U.S.C. 9871) are included in the State’s statewide longitudinal data system

 
Completed
Indicator (b)(1-4) The capacity to communicate with higher education data systems as described in section 6401(e)(2)(D) of the America COMPETES Act (20 U.S.C. 9871) are included in the State’s statewide longitudinal data system

 
Completed
Indicator (b)(1-5) A state data audit system assessing data quality, validity, and reliability as described in section 6401(e)(2)(D) of the America COMPETES Act (20 U.S.C. 9871) are included in the State’s statewide longitudinal data system

 
Completed
Indicator (b)(1-6) Yearly test records of individual students with respect to assessments under section 111(b) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311(b)) as described in section 6401(e)(2)(D) of the America COMPETES Act (20 U.S.C. 9871) are included in the State’s statewide longitudinal data system

 
Completed
Indicator (b)(1-7) Information on students not tested by grade and subject as described in section 6401(e)(2)(D) of the America COMPETES Act (20 U.S.C. 9871) are included in the State’s statewide longitudinal data system

 
Completed
Indicator (b)(1-8) A teacher identifier system with the ability to match teachers to students as described in section 6401(e)(2)(D) of the America COMPETES Act (20 U.S.C. 9871) are included in the State’s statewide longitudinal data system

 
Completed
Indicator (b)(1-9) Student-level transcript information including information on courses completed and grades earned as described in section 6401(e)(2)(D) of the America COMPETES Act (20 U.S.C. 9871) are included in the State’s statewide longitudinal data system

 
Completed
Indicator (b)(1-10) Student-level college readiness test scores as described in section 6401(e)(2)(D) of the America COMPETES Act (20 U.S.C. 9871) are included in the State’s statewide longitudinal data system

 
Completed
Indicator (b)(1-11) Information regarding the extent to which students transition successfully from secondary school to postsecondary education, including whether students enroll in remedial coursework as described in section 6401(e)(2)(D) of the America COMPETES Act (20 U.S.C. 9871) are included in the State’s statewide longitudinal data system

 
Results
posted 3/11/2013
Indicator (b)(1-12) Other information determined necessary to address alignment and adequate preparation for success in postsecondary education as described in section 6401(e)(2)(D) of the America COMPETES Act (20 U.S.C. 9871) are included in the State’s statewide longitudinal data system. 

 
Explanation of Alignment Activities
Indicator (b)(2) Whether the State provides student growth data on their current students and the students they taught in the previous year to, at a minimum, teachers of reading/language arts and mathematics in grades in which the State administers assessments in those subjects in a manner that is timely and informs instructional programs

 
Explanation of the Reporting Tools for Student Performance
Indicator (b)(3) Whether the State provides teachers of reading/language arts and mathematics in grades in which the State administers assessments in those subjects with reports of individual teacher impact on student achievement on those assessments

 
Explanation of the Reporting Tools for Student Performance

 

Standards and Assessments (education reform area (c))

Indicator (c)(1) The approval status, as determined by the Department, of the State’s assessment system under section 1111(b)(3) of the ESEA with respect to reading/language arts, mathematics, and science assessments

 
Approval Letter From USDE
Indicator (c)(2) Whether the State has developed and implemented valid and reliable alternate assessments for students with disabilities that are approved by the Department

 
Kansas Alternative Assessment

Approval Letter From USDE
Indicator (c)(3) Whether the State’s alternate assessments for students with disabilities, if approved by the Department, are based on grade-level, modified, or alternate academic achievement standards

 
Kansas Alternative Assessment

Approval Letter From USDE
Indicator (c)(4) Whether the State has completed, within the last two years, an analysis of the appropriateness and effectiveness of the accommodations it provides students with disabilities to ensure their meaningful participation in State assessments

 
Assessment Accommodations
Indicator (c)(5) The number and percentage of students with disabilities who are included in State reading/language arts and mathematics assessments

 
Participation Rates
Indicator (c)(6) Whether the State has completed, within the last two years, an analysis of the appropriateness and effectiveness of the accommodations it provides limited English proficient students to ensure their meaningful participation in State assessments

 
Status of Native Language Versions
Indicator (c)(7) Whether the State provides native language versions of State assessments for limited English proficient students that are approved by the Department

 
State Assessments-Native Language
Indicator (c)(8) The number and percentage of limited English proficient students who are included in State reading/language arts and mathematics assessments

 
Number of LEP Students In Assessments
Indicator (c)(9) Whether the State’s annual State Report Card (under section 1111(h)(1) of the ESEA) contains the most recent available State reading and mathematics National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) results as required by 34 CFR 200.11(c)

 
NAEP Results
Indicator (c)(10) Provide, for the State, for each LEA in the State, for each high school in the State and, at each of these levels, by student subgroup (consistent with section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v)(II) of the ESEA), the number and percentage (including numerator and denominator) of students who graduate from high school using a four-year adjusted cohort graduation rate as required by 34 CFR 200.19(b)(1)(i).
 
State Cohort Graduation Data
PDF Document PDF

School District Cohort Graduation Data
Indicator (c)(11) Provide, for the State, for each LEA in the State, for each high school in the State and, at each of these levels, by student subgroup (consistent with section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v)(II) of the ESEA), of the students who graduate from high school consistent with 34 CFR 200.19(b)(1)(i), the number and percentage (including numerator and denominator) who enroll in an institution of higher education (IHE) (as defined in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA)) within 16 months of receiving a regular high school diploma.
 
Graduates Enrolled within 16 months
Excel Document Excel

Graduates Enrolled within 16 months by Subgroup
Excel Document 
Excel
Indicator (c)(12) Provide, for the State, for each LEA in the State, for each high school in the State and, at each of these levels, by student subgroup (consistent with section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v)(II) of the ESEA), of the students who graduate from high school consistent with 34 CFR 200.19(b)(1)(i) who enroll in a public IHE (as defined in section 101(a) of the HEA) in the State within 16 months of receiving a regular high school diploma, the number and percentage (including numerator and denominator) who complete at least one year's worth of college credit (applicable to a degree) within two years of enrollment in the IHE.
 
Graduates who complete one year’s college credit within two years of enrollment in the IHE
Excel Document Excel

Graduates who complete one year’s college credit within two years of enrollment in the IHE by subgroup 
 Excel Document Excel

 

Supporting Struggling Schools (education reform area (d))

Indicator (d)(1) The average statewide school gain in the “all students” category and the average statewide school gain for each student subgroup (as under section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v) of the ESEA) on the State assessments in reading/language arts, and for the State and for each LEA in the State the number and percentage (including the numerator and denominator) of Title I schools in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring that have made progress on State assessments in reading/language arts, in the last year
 
Average Statewide School Gain - Read/Language Arts

Descriptor (d)(1) The definition of "persistently lowest achieving schools" that the state uses to identify such schools. Persistently Lowest-Achieving School
Indicator (d)(2) The average statewide school gain in the “all students” category and the average statewide school gain for each student subgroup (as under section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v) of the ESEA) on State assessments in mathematics, and for the State and for each LEA in the State the number and percentage (including numerator and denominator) of Title I schools in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring that have made progress on State assessments in mathematics, in the last year
 
Average Statewide School Gain - Mathematics
Indicator (d)(3) The number and identity of the schools that are Title I schools in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring that are identified as persistently lowest-achieving schools

 
School Intervention Models
Indicator (d)(4) Indicator (d)(4) Of the persistently lowest-achieving schools that are Title I schools in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring, the number and identity of those schools that have been turned around, restarted, closed, or transformed (as defined in this notice) in the last year

 
School Intervention Models
Indicator (d)(5) The number and identity of the schools that are secondary schools that are eligible for, but do not receive, Title I funds that are identified as persistently lowest-achieving schools

 
Secondary Schools
Indicator (d)(6) Of the persistently lowest-achieving schools that are secondary schools that are eligible for, but do not receive, Title I funds, the number and identity of those schools that have been turned around, restarted, closed, or transformed in the last year

 
School Intervention Models
2010 - 2011
2011 - 2012
Indicator (d)(7)
Posted 1/25/2010
Reviewed 9/1/2010
The number of charter schools that are currently permitted to operate under State law

 

Charter Schools Permitted

Indicator (d)(8) The number of charter schools currently operating

 
Charter Schools Operating

Indicator (d)(9) The number and percentage of charter schools that have made progress on State assessments in reading/language arts in the last year

 
Charter State Assessments in reading /language arts
Indicator (d)(10) The number and percentage of charter schools that have made progress on State assessments in mathematics in the last year

 
Charter State Assessments in mathematics
Indicator (d)(11) The number and identity of charter schools that have closed (including schools that were not reauthorized to operate) within each of the last five years

 
Closed Charter Schools (Last 5 Years)
Indicator (d)(12) For each charter school that has closed (including a school that was not reauthorized to operate) within each of the last five years, whether the closure of the school was for financial, enrollment, academic, or other reasons

 
Reason Charter Schools Closed

 

       
Get Adobe ReaderSome documents on this website require Adobe Reader to view. Get Adobe Reader