Skip to Content
KSDE Logo picture
Frequently Asked Questions Site Map Calendar Contact Us Employment Kansas.gov website
Wednesday, June 19, 2013 | Login
ParentsStudentsTeachersAdministratorsData, Media and Reports
You are here: Divisions » Learning Services-Mr. Brad Neuenswander » Title Programs and Services » Title I Schools on Improvement » Kansas Improvement Notebook » Section A » Timelines

        
   

Contact: 

Contact:

 
Howard Shuler
Interim Director - Title Programs and Services
Phone:
  785-296-3069
Email: 
hshuler@ksde.org
    
  Online Kansas Improvement Notebook  
    

Kansas Improvement Model: Timelines

 

Phase One
Phase Two
Phase Three
Stage 1: 
 
Orientation & Readiness
Stage 2:
 
Gather & Organize Data
Stage 3:
 
Analyze Data
Stage 4:
 
Prioritize & Set Goals
Stage 5:
 
Research & Identify Effective Strategies/
Practices
 
Stage 6:
 
Develop & Implement Plan(s)
Stage 7:
 
Monitor Implementation & Progress
Stage 8:
 
Review & Revise
Develop a clear picture of what it will take to progress through the eight stages of the improvement process. The appropriate structures and supports for this to happen will be in place (e.g., planning team, district buy-in, shared vision).
Select data to collect in five categories: perception, achievement, behavior, contextual and demographics. Conduct a self-evaluation by each district or school (see the District Integrated Needs Assessment). Data is prepared to facilitate analysis using a data carousel activity.
Identify root causes of the issue. Completion of this stage will result in an analysis of data based on narratives, charts and graphs displaying the current status of the school and/or district system. A prioritized list of challenges will be generated and used in subsequent stages to develop SMART goals and improvement plans.
Determine priorities for local needs based on district/school strengths and challenges identified by data analysis. Challenges/concerns are grouped into themes. Clear, measurable and time-bound SMART goals are written and prioritized.
Identify SBR practices, strategies, programs, and/or interventions that address the stated goals and root causes to provide the basis of improvement plans through additional research and analysis of data, identification of best practices, and site-visits. Districts encourage individual schools to deal with issues systemically.
Focus specific improvement plans on prioritized areas, describing the specific activities, timelines, persons responsible and outcome measures for each strategy, intervention, and/or program created. Implementation means putting the plan fully into practice by carrying out the tasks identified.
Monitor implementation of the action plan, identified strategies/practices and student progress to ensure continuous progress toward achieving school/district goals. Formative and summative measures are used to see if progress is occurring toward each SMART goal. Based on this information, plans are revised as necessary.
Analyze formative and summative measures specified in the improvement plans to determine if student needs have been met. Data on system changes (structural goals) and student achievement (core goals) should be considered.
Deadlines: On Target*. Districts and schools establish timelines for completing each stage. It is recommended that every district and school review data at least on a yearly basis. Then review and revise improvement plans accordingly.
Deadlines: On Watch**. It is recommended that districts and schools complete stages 1- 6 during the year the district and/or school is On Watch. 
They will initiate stage 7 and 8 the year following the On Watch year.
Deadlines: On Improvement and Accredited on Improvement***. These districts and/or schools are required to complete stages 1 – 6 within 90 days of official notification from KSDE following the Kansas State School Board meeting. Stages 7 and 8 are to be initiated by the beginning of second semester.
If stages 1-6 were completed the previous year, stages 7 and 8 are initiated within 90 days of official notification.

  • *On Target refers a district and/or school that has made AYP two or more consecutive years for NCLB. “On Target” also refers to schools that have met QPA criteria two or more consecutive years.
  • **On Watch refers to a district and/or school that previously was On Target and has not made AYP for one year for NCLB. If that district does not make AYP for a second consecutive year, the school will be on improvement. On Watch also refers to schools previously On Target that did not meet QPA criteria for one year. If that school does not meet OPA criteria for a second consecutive year, the school will be Accredited on Improvement.
  • ***On Improvement refers to a district and/or school that has not made AYP two or more consecutive years for NCLB. Accredited on Improvement refers to a school that has not met QPA criteria two or more years. 
       
Get Adobe ReaderSome documents on this website require Adobe Reader to view. Get Adobe Reader